The DN of the Debate. Ruth is a self-financed to 90 per cent of the public sector

on The first of July, 2007, the tax reduction for household-related services, which called for the rutavdraget. The Rut is the shortening of the Cleaning, Maintenance, and Service, and the tax deduction allows individuals the opportunity to make tax deductions for certain sorts of household work.

for more than twelve years of age, who rutavdraget been in existence, it has been disputed by some politicians. The limits of the provision of services within the scope of the deduction has been moved to the front and back, and there is a maximum to the amount of the deduction has been reduced and is increased during the reporting period.

in the Year of 2009, purchased 113.000-swedes ruttjänster 550 million of 5.800 company. Since then, both of the purchasers, the companies and the people who work in the rutföretag multiplied many times over. In the year 2018, the purchased 966.000 the swedes by means of the rutavdraget of 21.000 companies. These companies had a turnover of 10.2 billion crowns in the ruttjänster, and employed more than 50,000 people.

Rutavdraget to create major new works for people who are far from the labour market, at a price point that is low when you take into consideration all of the effects of the rutavdraget in the public sector.

for The past year, rutavdraget been criticized on several fronts. Most recently, the government of office at growth analysis bruttokostnaden for payment to the rutarbeten, who immediately agreed to help the unemployed and other disadvantaged groups in the labour market. These studies, however, do not take account of the fact that the purpose of the rutavdraget is not primarily focused on the creation of new jobs for the people who were outside the labour market. The main objective of the reform was to give the people who carried out these services to black and in conformity with the contract, the salary, the insurance, and the right to a sickness benefit and a pension for their work. The aim was that the people who bought the ruttjänster would be able to do more if they wanted it, that is to say, the increase in the number of hours worked in the economy.

Prior to the rutavdraget was introduced, did the government institute of economic Research in the year 2005, the socio-economic investigation of the system. The report came to the conclusion that a combination of dirty jobs, who will become white, and increased employment among recipients of ruttjänster and creation of new jobs in the rutbranschen to the people who were outside the labour market would be able to do rutavdraget self-financing of the public sector. The report was challenged, and the debate was high. Since it has been almost 15 years since that report was presented, and for more than twelve years, since the deduction was introduced, there is a need to thoroughly investigate what turned out to be.

This is the first major evaluation of the rutavdraget since it was first introduced.

a classic example of the study show that the rutavdraget for more than 90 per cent of it is self-financing for the public sector. The deduction is meant the reduction in tax revenue for the government of eur 5.1 billion by 2018 for the public sector – central government, local government and the regions was in the same year is back to 4.5 billion in the form of increased tax revenues and reduced the level of benefits. In essence, there are three big benefits:

1

The largest earnings item for the general government sector's revenues from just over 13,000 new jobs, of which rutavdraget estimated to be created for the people who were previously unemployed or outside the labour market. , the SYSTEM will calculate the increase in tax revenue from these individuals, and the reduction in benefits for unemployment, at 2.5 million a year.

2

The other main earnings item for the general government sector, it is extra work, making it possible for people to buy ruttjänster have been able to accomplish in the time that is freed up. , the SYSTEM calculates that this resulted in a 1.5-billion in extra tax revenue per year.

3

in The third, and smallest, but, at the same time, the most important earnings item, from rutavdraget helped to make the black job white.