Hammarberg and Bjereld turn a blind eye to arab anti-semitism

Thomas Hammarberg, and Ulf Bjereld, writes that the fight against anti-semitism, is of the utmost importance to those who wish for peace in Israel and Palestine. There is a positive appropriation, and it is also very positive that sweden's Prime minister Stefan Löfvén has endorsed the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition and examples of anti-semitism.

the Authors lays down since the article on IHRA's definitions are not sufficient because they can be ”interpreted” that you can't criticize Israel, its institutions, and its ”violation of international law”. It should be pointed out that the discussion of politics in the west bank, are part of everyday life in the jewish world and in Israel, where freedom of the press and freedom of speech is one of the country's democratic pillars.

In the article, the following is a long list of sweeping generalizations about the west's historical responsibility for anti-semitism, and to highlight the fact that the proposal of the article is to sharpen the struggle against anti-semitism, but to show the manner in which some of the examples that are already available in the IHRA's definition is inadequate. For balansens the sake of it is taken up, in a sweeping statement, that the palestinians are also in violation of the law, and the organizations that use the anti-semitism and his advocacy for one side.

about 2 months ago, the situation that we, Thomas Hammarberg, in the parliament, and introduced a large number of examples in the text and the image, which shows how the textbooks of the primary schools in the west bank and the Gaza strip indoctrinates anti-semitism, martyrdom, and violence in UNRWA schools.

We have also presented for the Swedish minister of foreign affairs, and the biståndsministern in Sweden, is one of the largest donors to UNRWA. The authors of the article, the ruling party in Palestine, Fatah as their sister party.

If this is mellanösternantisemitism mention Hammarberg, and Bjereld's nothing. The only one who has been accused of something specific in the article is Israel and its violations of international law”. IHRA defines this rhetorical skills that is a double standard in the definition of the type of anti-semitism, which is known as the evil israelkritik. This article should be, and if it were to remain neutral, and to actually care about anti-semitism, and to take it up to the fact that Swedish tax money is funding the schools in which the våldsbejakande, and the anti-semitic school books are used, and for which the MINISTRY for foreign affairs or to the Side of the public takes away from this.

and thus damaging to both palestinian and israeli children and their future. As fredsvänner should Hammarberg, and Bjereld take up this issue in an article about anti-semitism, and the connection to the middle east.

Hammarberg in addition, at the end of the session of the parliament, in the presence of witnesses, ask the one and only present, the jew, if he is able to be independent, thus meeting the definition of anti-semitism.

hammarberg's, and Bjerelds the article, only served to blur the clear-cut definition of anti-semitism, as IHRA has done. They ignore, too, from the effects of anti-semitism from the palestine liberation organization (PLO, the UNRWA, and even Iran in the middle east and in Sweden. To the authors, in addition, is a big proponent of financial support to the organizations that spread this anti-semitic propaganda, should be, if nothing else, give rise to all tax-payers in Sweden as well.