The PP challenges the PSOE to support evictions of 'squatters' in one day instead of the 48 hours of its amendment

MADRID, 7 Oct. (EUROPA PRESS) -

The PP is going to force a vote in Congress to challenge the PSOE to support that the 'squatters' must be evicted within a maximum period of one day compared to the 48 hours that the socialists defend in an amendment to the reform of the Law of Criminal Procedure that has unleashed a new confrontation between the two parties that make up the coalition government.

The text registered by the PP, to which Europa Press has had access, is a motion as a consequence of the questioning that the first opposition party addressed this Thursday to the Minister of Justice, Pilar Llop.

The initiative cannot be debated until the first week of November, since there is no plenary session in the next two weeks and the one scheduled for the last week of October is reserved for the debate of the entire 2023 Budget.

In its initiative, the PP summarizes its recipes to fight against 'squatting' and cites in the first place that the eviction must be carried out within a maximum of 24 hours from the request if the occupants of the property do not prove the legal title that legitimizes their stay. in the same.

They also demand that the eviction be immediate in the event of a flagrant crime, that the crime of trespassing be excluded from the jurisdiction of the Jury Court, that the penalties for usurpation be reinforced with up to three years in prison and that legal protection be improved. against the actions of the mafias.

Likewise, they are committed to considering the registration of an illegal occupant in the municipal register null and void and for prohibiting an occupied property from being considered a dwelling or domicile, so that the occupants do not enjoy the same protection as those who buy or rent a home. .

Another of the proposals of the PP is that the communities of owners be legitimized to carry out preventive actions against the occupation and to be able to go to the authorities when in the absence of the owner the occupants carry out prohibited, annoying, unhealthy, harmful or dangerous activities.

Finally, the 'popular' propose that the amounts of the Real Estate Tax that they have paid during the occupation be returned to the owners and that the occupied property be recorded as the habitual residence (if it was before) so that the owners do not suffer the loss tax benefits to which they are entitled.