Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

The students have reason to react

TV-tip that takes you on holiday student welfare organizations in the Uk, which should offer good welfare services to students, fits in any case well on its

- 3 reads.

The students have reason to react
TV-tip that takes you on holiday

student welfare organizations in the Uk, which should offer good welfare services to students, fits in any case well on its directors. This weekend wrote universitetsavisa Khrono about how the directors of the various student welfare organizations may take out the very high wages for the work they do. Lisbeth Dyrberg, director of the Student welfare organisation in Oslo, 2,19 million a year in salary and other benefits. She thus serves considerably more than prime minister Erna Solberg.

student welfare organizations yourself believe only they offer competitive terms. It voices the opinion that the student welfare organizations are large enterprises that require highly skilled and experienced leaders. The high management wages still unreasonable considering that it is the students themselves who pay for them.

These are young people who spend years of their life and take up large loans to complete the courses. They should have every reason to expect that as much as possible of what they pay in, goes back to them, in the form of, for example, lower rent for the studentboligene or more and better health care.

Turn On the LydErrorAllerede plus customer? Log into herError STUDENTS: Wednesday, 25. march there came a petition from a number of organizations, with the Norwegian student organization in the lead: Students must receive support on a par with other workers. Video: Nicolai Delebekk / Dagbladet TV, 25. march 2020 Show more

In all there is the student welfare organizations very good store, and they have previously received criticism for to build up great equity at the same time as the students have unmet needs for shelter and welfare.

Especially studentsamskipnadenes gyms, which also has a significant group of customers who do not have affiliation with universities and colleges, has been a great success. Rate Elixia has previously complained over what they believe is unfair distortion of competition when samskipnadene, with its less vulnerable economy, taking customers from them.

But it is so it is when the welfare foretakifiseres in too great a degree. Then it quickly becomes so that also those who need to be oriented towards the needs of users, is more than concerned to generate profit and compete for lederansettelser.

the Word "velferdsprofitører" has become a parable: as the last few years has been thrown out both where it fits well and not so well, but it would not be an unreasonable word to use in this context. The last nyhetssakene suggests that students who pay for the guild has every reason to react. Student welfare organizations should look at prioteringslisten her, and do about it.

Fewer students in boligkø due to corona Dagbladet Plus You can submit your article and opinion piece in Dagbladet here

Want to discuss?

Visit Dagbladet debate!
Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.