The PSOE and its partners stop the amendments to the amnesty and discredit the PP that imitates Vox and asks to make parties illegal

The socialists and ERC assume that Feijóo would have agreed with Junts if he could have: "They would have given them everything"

The PSOE and all its investiture partners have made clear this Wednesday their rejection of the full amendments with alternative text presented by the PP and Vox to the Amnesty Law in a debate that has become a flood of criticism of the 'popular ' for having given in to Vox's theses proposing the illegalization of pro-independence parties that they had previously rejected in several parliamentary votes.

The two alternative texts have been knocked down, but the result of the votes has been different because, while Vox has supported the PP, the 'popular' have not supported that of Santiago Abascal, who has only received the votes for favor of its 33 deputies. For its part, UPN has joined the proposal of its electoral partner, but has rejected that of Vox.

Once the entire amendments have been cleared, the Amnesty Law continues its parliamentary processing in Congress. In principle, the deadline for registering partial amendments ends on the 16th, which will have to be debated first in a presentation and then in committee. The expectation is that the text will return to the Plenary this month to be approved and sent to the Senate.

During the presentation of her initiative, Vox spokesperson, Pepa Rodríguez de Millán, has reiterated her criticism of a law that, in her opinion, represents the "collapse of the democratic system" because it implies recognizing "that violence works", and has defended their alternative text in which they propose recovering the crime of sedition, prohibiting negotiations with convicted, prosecuted or fugitives and the illegalization of pro-independence parties.

Millán has taken advantage of the debate to disfigure the PP that first put the "dissolution of separatist parties" on the table, but then backed down and showed itself willing to reduce the scope of this proposal. "It's a shame that every time they get it right they look to the left for approval. You don't owe them anything, or at least, you shouldn't," he slipped, before demanding a "firm opposition" and without " ambiguities" in the face of separatism.

The general secretary of the PP, Cuca Gamarra, has rejected the amnesty on the grounds that it is unconstitutional and covers not only "the political coup" but also "terrorist acts" and "corruption." She has also denounced that she opens the way to "take over lawfare" and "undermine judicial independence" because it creates a "private preserve in which certain politicians can roam freely without having to sit under the control of judges." ".

Likewise, it has defended the "political opportunity and legal solidity" of its alternative text in which it seeks to classify the crime of "constitutional disloyalty" with different penalties, such as the dissolution of parties that promote illegal referendums or proclaim independence. "It does not seem extraordinary, if the constitutional order is violated, that it can be suspended or dissolved at the request of the judges," said Gamarra.

The ERC spokesperson, Gabriel Rufián, has taken the turn against to especially criticize the alternative text of the PP, which he has called "regrettable", and to accuse its change, having gone from voting against the illegalization of pro-independence parties when the asks Vox to request its dissolution. Of course, he has been convinced that if the PP had not needed Vox to try to govern, "they would have given everything to Junts."

In his reply, Gamarra has reproached the Government for not taking the floor to defend its amnesty law and that it was Rufián who, "like a collector of the tailcoat", went up to the platform to "collect" the "price" that the independentists have appointed Sánchez to continue in La Moncloa. "I accept envelopes," Rufián later replied sarcastically.

Only the UPN deputy, Alberto Catalán, has joined the PP and Vox theses against the amnesty, while from the Canary Coalition, Cristina Valido, has denigrated the PSOE bill but also the alternative texts of the PP and Vox , for "disproportionate."

The rest of the parties that supported the investiture have also advanced their rejection of the entire amendments, and reproached the PP for, as some have said, having succumbed to the "pressure" of Vox and now defending the illegalization of separatist parties. which until now they rejected.

FOR CONSTITUTIONAL DISLOYALTY, THE BLOCKAGE OF THE CGPJ

The PSOE spokesperson in the Constitutional Commission, Artemi Rallo, has criticized the PP for "rude and obscene" constitutional disloyalty in the "1,863 days" that the renewal of the General Council of the Judiciary has been blocked and has blamed it for having " bought" from Vox the idea of ​​"illegalizing millions of Catalans."

Like other interveners, Rallo has placed emphasis on the fact that the PP asks to dissolve parties that organize illegal referendums when he polled Junts for the investiture of Alberto Núñez Feijóo and would have "agreed on amnesty" with them, and even "paraded through the Ramblas shouting in Catalan freedom, amnesty and statute of autonomy."

"Let's see if we understand it, in the morning Mr. (Esteban) González Pons has a coffee with them, in the afternoon Mr. (Miguel) Tellado dissolves them and at night Mr. Feijóo arrives and suspends them temporarily or permanently, still "They don't know. But is there really no one in Genoa with more enlightenment?", launched the socialist deputy.

A BLAZENNESS THAT DYNAMITS PLURALISM

Representing Sumar, IU deputy Enrique Santiago, has denounced the "double standard" that, from his point of view, hides the PP proposal. "They have never condemned Francoism, half of their group did not vote for the Constitution and they have the audacity to present us with a crime of institutional disloyalty," he snapped at them.

Junts deputy Josep María Cervera has criticized the PP for attempting to classify crimes for which pro-independence leaders have already been "convicted" and, on top of that, for wanting to outlaw them with an initiative that "dynamizes political pluralism." In his opinion, the first to be convicted of constitutional disloyalty should be the 'popular' for having "dynamited the constitutional pact by collecting signatures against the Statute."

Jon Iñarritu, from Bildu, and Mikel Legarda, from the PNV, have also disqualified the PP amendment. The first has said that with its alternative text the PP only seeks to put "mud and more mud" on the political scene, while Legarda has especially criticized the recovery of the classification of the call for illegal referendums that the PP advocates.

Néstor Rego (BNG) has defined the Gamarra proposal as "democratic involution", while Martina Velarde, from Podemos, has asked the 'popular' to "rethink" and respect the political pluralism contemplated in the Constitution.