Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook
Featured Pensiones Rothschild Ucrania Mujer y Deporte Joe Biden

UP distances itself from the election of Campo to the TC and criticizes the PSOE for applying this "revolving door" to the former minister

He assures that it is inconsistent with the discourse of judicial independence and with assuming the PP's veto of Victoria Rosell for the CGPJ.

- 8 reads.

UP distances itself from the election of Campo to the TC and criticizes the PSOE for applying this "revolving door" to the former minister

He assures that it is inconsistent with the discourse of judicial independence and with assuming the PP's veto of Victoria Rosell for the CGPJ

MADRID, 29 Nov. (EUROPA PRESS) -

The president of the parliamentary group of United We Can, Jaume Asens, has assured that the appointment of the former Minister of Justice Juan Carlos Campo and the former director general of the Ministry of the Presidency Laura Díez for the Constitutional Court (TC) is a unilateral decision of the PSOE, which he has described as "contrasent" and an exercise in "revolving door".

What's more, he has censured that it is an act of "cynicism" on the part of his partner to opt for the designation of Campo while the PP veto of the Government delegate against gender violence, Victoria Rosell, was assumed to be part of the Council General of the Judiciary, which is a political and non-judicial body.

This has been transferred at a press conference in Congress to report that the socialist wing of the Executive informed yesterday "last minute" of these two proposals to the guarantee court, which is not the result of a coalition pact and they have not participated in that deliberation.

Therefore, it has considered that it was a "necessary step" that the Government has decided to "comply with the law" and raise two magistrates of the TC, which should have been carried out in September after the 'express' reform of the Executive.

However, he has admitted that the confederal space would have liked to "discuss the names and their suitability", because taking Campo to a body of the importance of the Constitutional is inconsistent with that speech of "political independence" that the PSOE championed during the failed negotiation with the PP to renew the Judiciary.

"It seems inconsistent to us that Rosell is being vetoed by a body that is not judicial, but rather an organization of judicial policy, and that does not issue sentences and for the TC this is raised. It is a contradiction in the position of the PP and the PSOE ", He has launched.