Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook
Featured Junta de Castilla y León Pepsi

The PSOE insists on the lack of "basic consensus" to undertake the reform of sedition

MADRID, 26 Oct.

- 8 reads.

The PSOE insists on the lack of "basic consensus" to undertake the reform of sedition

MADRID, 26 Oct. (EUROPA PRESS) -

The PSOE spokesman in Congress, Patxi López, insisted this Wednesday that the Government wants to advance in the reform of sedition but that, in order to undertake changes in the criminal and civil codes, a broad "basic consensus" is needed, which in currently does not exist.

"At this time there is no basic consensus to be able to do it. There are issues in which it is not about having one more vote, but about having a solid base," he said in an interview on Antena 3, collected by Europa Press.

López has stressed that the Government is willing to move forward to "converge with what is regulated in the European Union" which, in his words, is "far removed" from what is in Spain.

However, he has emphasized the need for a "very broad consensus". "We talked about the basic architecture of the system," she added.

Thus, asked about whether the broad consensus refers to the PP, López agreed: "I'm thinking, for example." "It is good that we agree on much broader aspects," he added afterwards. In addition, he has questioned the 'popular' if it seems wrong to them to approach European regulation. "Why do they oppose?", He has emphasized him.

Of course, he has separated the sedition from the negotiation of the General State Budgets (PGE): "Negotiating the budgets is one thing and the other is something that there was a commitment from the beginning".

In another key, on the renewal of the General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ), the leader of the PSOE has asked for high sights so that the agreement takes place as soon as possible, although he trusts that it is "close".

On the stumbling block with the member proposed by Podemos, Victoria Rosell, has transferred that the agreement is "so important in itself" that "red lines by names" should not be put to block an agreement.