Charges of Podemos defend Rosell for the CGPJ and warn that it would be "incomprehensible" to accept the "bipartisan" veto

They assure that they will not give in to the PP's attempt to exclude the current Government delegate against gender violence

MADRID, 27 Oct. (EUROPA PRESS) -

Various positions and deputies of Podemos have defended that the Government delegate against gender violence, Victoria Rosell, should be part of the General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ) and have considered that it would be "incomprehensible" to accept the veto by the confederal space "unworthy" of "bipartisanship".

A multitude of cadres of the purple formation have expressed themselves in these terms just when the President of the Government, Pedro Sánchez, that the renewal agreement for the organization is ready in the absence of the PP saying yes, although later the popular have replicated those demonstrations to maintain that the pact is not closed.

In turn, the second vice president commented this morning that there is a "unique opportunity" to be able to unblock the governing body of the judges and has stressed that she is not going to talk about the names of the candidates because it "distorts" the objective of the negotiation .

In social networks, the state co-spokesperson for Podemos, Isa Serra, has affirmed on Twitter that the option for the PP and PSOE to agree on the renewal of the CGPJ based on the "veto" of Rosell "is not an advance", but a "regression". "for justice. "The veto is unworthy and it would be incomprehensible to accept it", she has delved into it.

In fact, he has continued to warn that this position of exclusion to the former deputy conveys the message that "institutions belong to bipartisanship" and that "brave" judges have "neither recognition nor place" in democracy.

Meanwhile, the secretary of the organization of the purple formation, Lilith Verstrynge, has also reported on networks that Rosell is an "irreproachable judge" who has been "persecuted and defamed" by former judge Salvador Alba, her "stalker" who has ended up in prison.

"We have seen too many bipartisan vetoes of those who approach Podemos for their ideas. The CGPJ must be renewed with the best candidates and in accordance with the social reality of the country," he reasoned.

In turn, the leader of the purple formation and referenced in the quota of En Comú Podem in Congress, Ismael Cortes, has proclaimed to "stop lawfare and democratize", justice "needs Rosell". "We will not give in. Victoria Rosell must be a member of the CGPJ," he added.

In the same way, the deputy Rosa Medel has ruled that "they cannot, nor do they want to, nor will they accept the bipartisan veto" to the Government delegate against gender violence, who is a defender of "just causes" and has been " victim of the worst of the judicial right".

His partner Lucía Muñoz has insisted that they will defend Rosell's "suitability" for the CGPJ "until its ultimate consequences", as evidenced by the head of Equality, Irene Montero, and has withdrawn that the "bipartisan veto" is "inadmissible".

The MEP and leader of Podemos, Idoia Villanueva, has criticized that "bipartisanship" is "closing ranks with lawfare" and insists on "defending" Rosell.

Former Vice President Pablo Iglesias has also denounced in networks the attempted exclusion of Rosell and has referred to information published by El Periódico de España and El Español regarding the fact that another candidate who would be considered in the quota that corresponds to United We Can is Joaquín Urias. .

"He is a prestigious jurist who should accompany Rosell to the CGPJ. He was a member of Podemos and appeared in the primaries. Nobody vetoes him because that is not the problem. The PP only wants to take revenge on Victoria Rosell," he argued.

And it is that the purple ones do not want to value any other name until the PP does not lift its veto to Rosell and that this formation cannot allow itself to put that condition in the negotiation. In fact, training sources indicated last week that they would not support an agreement that did not include Rosell.

Meanwhile, the spokesman for United We Can in Congress, Pablo Echenique, said on Tuesday that "no progressive" can accept that veto and that there is "unanimity" within United We Can that it is a "political infamy" and that the collective bet on that negotiation is to try not to exercise this exclusion.

Yesterday, the deputy spokesman in the chamber and IU deputy, Enrique Santiago, has indicated that the agreement to renew the CGPJ "seems to be close", although he has warned that the PP "is going to trip up a lot" and "vetoes " to try to frustrate him, so they don't have to fall for those "provocations".

"The important thing at this time is that what happened a year ago does not happen, that an agreement was frustrated at the last moment due to the traps of the PP and because it depends on the CGPJ to unlock the TC, on which such important things depend in this country. such as guaranteeing the right to abortion, that the labor reform continues or the Euthanasia Law," he settled.

Some sectors of United We Can recognize that the confluence must deal with a complex issue, in case an agreement is reached and Rosell is not part of it, and that it can be an element of tension within the space.