A number of objections can be raised against the artikelförfattarnas arguments:
1
first, the mean of the four think that it is important to provide school principals with more authority. , However, in view of the qualified skills that the ki management is showed in a year or two ago so as soon as the reduction of the head teachers ' power in the area. In addition, the debaters, that is a kind of professional nepotism prevails in our universities, where the professors, at the end will go to any lengths to get their own employees as followers. Perhaps the debaters many years of international experience gained with them, keeping in mind that it is checked the presence of cronyism, carefully, as well as the possible conflicts of interest of experts in connection with research.
2
the second is English of the university mission, as well as their responsibilities, a three-piece.
the Law provides that the research should not just be for its own sake, but also as a platform for further and higher education. And the third, that to engage in a dialogue with the community, the case is hardly the only industry. The self-centered excellence, thus, has a little bit of that at the non-university colleges. To the business use of external cutting edge research are that the best, outside of the state colleges and universities. 3 , third, the debattörkvartetten overlook the fact that it is the formal knowledge that research generates must be translated into practical know-how before it can be operated, in order to strengthen Swedish companies ' competitiveness. , Moreover, the debaters make the mistake of not realizing that even the knowledge which is the basis of innovation, i.e. innovations that have a potential to generate value, it needs no more than down-to-earth contractors ' assistance in order to be realized, and can be useful.
4 , finally, there are the debaters does not explicitly spell out what the choice of the frontier " and says the ”best and most forward-looking research. in Between the lines is, however, it is clear that they are just seeing the natural sciences and engineering research which is worth to be spent on it. But it is good, not the best for the most part, can very well, other lines of research, including social sciences and the humanities, to be. Here, it may be worthwhile to consider what incentive he had to itself as a broad-minded entrepreneur. There was hardly any cooperation with the vetenskapssamhälle without the hands-on experiments in remote locations, combined with a secret of dreaming of a better world, and, in addition, on your own success as a fiction writer.
<