in the Public sector need to be developed close to the people. This should be done by increasing the ”trust,” claimed a top ten researcher in Swedish Debate (29/12 2019). What this means is clear, hardly out of the article, however, the trust will avoid micro-management, and formalism, as well as helping people with a variety of needs.
By applying the tillitsstyrning be achieved as well, according to the team, a good working environment and a better management of the resources. In addition, the exacerbated corruption by creating a culture of accountability in which the visselblåsande is to be welcomed. However, as a way to control a recording of trust are presented, it runs the risk of discouraging rather than promoting the desired development of the sector and the public sector.
the Authors refer to as a forskarauktoritet, Adler, who is a discerner of the three organizational ”governance principles” (koordineringsmekanismer): hierarchy, market and trust. It is the result of an interaction among these three, the ten, however, the trust is a underbetonad the principle of a modern society.
on the other. The trust may occur as a result of a successful collaboration. Even if it were desirable, it is not possible to provide confidence, as a little bit of love or happiness.
to try To improve the conditions for trust, however, is likely to be in verksamhetsförbättrande. However, there are a few essentials that the authors overlooked. One is that it has to be a limit to that love. Over-reliance is close to the naive gullibility. The extent to which, for example, a police officer, a researcher, or administrator in a welfare paid from the trust, as a principle? Too much trust can also complicate accountability, development, and learning, as well as a critical and independent approach as well as an oväldigt, and the objective action, and this is particularly important in the public sector.
the Management of the organizations includes, by necessity, to the handling of the conflict, including, inter alia, through the exercise of power. In the hierarchical control of the parent by the to punish or reward according to specific rules.
market: with the most political power and to exercise it through the procedure. But how is the power and resolution of conflicts takes place, where trust, to be applied, they give the ten to the researchers, is no guide. The two concepts do not appear to even exist for them, as well as a lot of other organisationsteoretisk american literature), or, in the tillitsdelegationens studies.
the Persistent's trust could not be achieved without the regulation of the exercise of power and conflict, whether in organizations or in other social situations. The tillitsstyrning, which are described in this article will, therefore, likely to be counterproductive and to increase the anarchy and the chaos, and, in spite of – or because of – all of the best intentions.
The claims in the article that a lot of mistakes in the management of the public sector could have been avoided if politicians and civil servants listen more closely to the research. It is, of course, is not impossible, but unproven, and I take it for granted that there are many more scientists contributed to the design of the New Public Management than to criticize this phenomenon.
in reality, as the authors argued, might be due to that, thankfully, will not be so clear-cut. In addition, there are many researchers, unknowingly, is still a patriarchal organization, and the human beings, which is not very realistic in today's Sweden.
ten scientists from many institutions to collaborate in dealing with the trust on the basis stated in the article is surprising and may be explained by the concept of a, has about the same capacity as, for example, the goodness of it will be able to say no to it. Maybe the article is an example of a high level of confidence. A slightly more nuanced and critical approach to the concept of increased credibility, and is likely to be required in the proposed tillitsakademi.<