Jubileumsprojektet is the largest single investment in municipality-owned nöjesparkens history – taking now in, in January, started with the construction of the Amusement park, the Grand curiosa list, the Hotel, which is scheduled for the 457 in place.
Later on in the year, Liseberg's board of directors to make the final decision as to the fortsättningsdelen, the 18,000-square-foot water park, where the half-a-million visitors a year.
as the president and Ceo Andreas Andersen, says to dagens nyheter:
" Jubileumsprojektet is a bit of a matter of course for us. Without it, we would not be able to survive. But are there risks? Yes, of course.< Lisebergs ceo Andreas Andersen was the 23 of september last year, the board of directors the go-ahead to start building the hotel. Photo: Thomas Ohlsson
it is planned to Lisebergsbolagets to equity ratio to temporarily drop from the current 58 per cent to about 40 per cent after five years, about 49 percent, according to the estimate the board had received.
However, even if the politicians in the city council, have already, for close to two years ago, has taken the overall decision and to provide the amusement park Liseberg AB, the go-ahead to invest the equivalent of more than two billion in 2021 at the latest, the price level, has the law of silence in the autumn, was commissioned to find a support, in order to try to nödstoppa construction of the building, but, to the contrary, to give the Liseberg management the go-ahead to pursue it further.
It is a well-known fact that the democratic party, which became the second largest party in the elections, are critical of what they consider to be both over-optimistic estimates of income from residents, restaurants, and the guests, that it was feared that the cost of the actual construction of the building would significantly exceed the approved scope.
to think of a Amusement park as a part of the water in the new Jubileumsprojektet. Photo: the Hill of the Fold, the Studio/amusement park Liseberg AB -
on the 11th of december, urging the Democrats to Jubileumsprojektet, with reference to the so-called " uppsiktsplikt would decide to do that, ”with the support of external expertise to analyse and vidimera the actual cost and the intäktskalkyl is accurate, complete, and contain reasonable assumptions, ( ... )”.
the Democrats did get the support of the SD, but the proposal fell by a vote of 10-3. The majority states that ”the municipal council has not been given any indication of that in the current situation would fall within the council's annual uppsiktsplikt”.
Behind the phrase ”no indication” is hiding two separate documents:
An analysis by Liseberg AB, board of directors, ordered from the Front of Their lawyer, Kaisa Adlercreutz, and the lawyer, Karl Fahlvik, and was delivered to the 27th of October.
the analysis of the previous Stadsjuristen Jan Persson delivered to the Liseberg's parent company, Göteborg & Co, 11 oct.
the Conclusion of the analysis is that the Front of the solicitors delivered to the client, Liseberg's board of directors was the fact that they do not need to have recourse to the council of the new one.
the Two came to the conclusion that, yes, yes, yes, there are some uncertainties, but not to such an extent that the Liseberg board of directors needs to ask the council to take a decision.
the company chose to hire outside counsel was that the Democrats had previously done the same thing – the advokatrapport came to the opposite conclusion. The Wåhlins Jonas, We wrote a report and said that, ”there is a number of fundamentally changed circumstances compared to the situation in 2017, and that ”it is more than to receive the instant decision, ( ... ), is a question which is of fundamental nature,” and that, therefore, it requires that ”the trustees have the opportunity to take a stand”.
based on this, chose a New member of the board member of Liseberg's board of directors: Lars Nilsson, the reserve at the time of the general agreement the board of directors on 23 september adopted a decision to approve the budget of the hotel.
as Nilsson wrote, in the proviso, which is dated two days after the decision was made to ”my reservation is (...) designed for escape from a future of possible skadestånds and the claims, which the rest of the members of the board shall take the responsibility”.
In an op-ed piece in which he justified his decision to be a dissenting opinion, wrote that Nilsson, that he is not opposed to the idea as such of the hotel and the water park, but concluded: ”Jubileumsprojektet in and of itself, is, in its essential design, is a very exciting project that is able to generate new streams of visitors to Gothenburg. What we believe is the most important one of Liseberg's survival in the future, or for a municipal corporation in general will pay to the construction and operation of a hotel and a water theme park, is not relevant to this discussion.”
here is how to think of the Amusement parts of the interior of the Jubileumsprojektets Grand curiosa list of the Hotel. Photo: the Hill of the Fold, the Studio/amusement park Liseberg AB -
- do not agree with all of that, the scenario has changed to any significant extent.
" the increase in cost is relatively small. The calculation has been improved, not least of all because we are building more and more rooms, " says Andersen to the dagens nyheter, adding that it is based on the assessments made by the primary hotellkonsulterna in the region.
According to the documents, which the DN has taken the part of the assessing the Amusement park that the entire amount of the investment in the Jubileumsprojektet will give you a surplus of eur 58 million a year on the opening day.
the Amusement park refers to the fact that they are the only one in the top ten nöjesparksanläggning in Europe that does not have a year-round business in the form of integrated accommodation, with ancillary activities in the park.
" We don't sit around by themselves and find the answer. We are just as anxious as all the others, it'll be all right. However, the benefit of this debate is that we must tighten up our arguments and take another look, and I think that the estimates are very robust. In the political discussion, however, I don't get out of, " says ceo, Andreas Andersen.
See also: Lisebergschefen the decision to return.