Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook
Featured Crímenes corrupción Feijóo Italia Telefónica

The DN of the Debate. Where is the decency, the lowest limit of the Swedish welfare?

”and Who protects the vulnerable child's right to grow up in the protection of the social secretaries hills?” ”Fewer and fewer social workers would like to tak

- 95 reads.

The DN of the Debate. Where is the decency, the lowest limit of the Swedish welfare?

”and Who protects the vulnerable child's right to grow up in the protection of the social secretaries hills?” ”Fewer and fewer social workers would like to take the leaden myndighetsansvaret that comprise the safety net of last resort.” An increasing number of acutely homeless people in Sweden's three largest cities. ”Thousands and thousands of homeless people to spend christmas in the outdoors.” ”The money is being taken from the welfare to a passive income support.” ”It doesn't pay to live the life of the grant.”

the Quote above is taken from the Royal library's digitisation of the archive of Swedish newspapers, and relates to the social services in Sweden. There has been a reversal of the trend in the tidningsrapporteringen ago 2014. Since this is the year we get over 10,000 hits every year if we are looking at the concept of ”Social services”. In the past year, it was a fraction of today's hits.

also Scares many of its shortcomings. But most of all, it's all about the teams that are in the well's margin, and which is in the middle in recent years. They may not be part of the security system, as it is a major part of the swedes, as a matter of course. They are not allowed to take part in the general social welfare policy. The case of child abuse, children, and adults who have been victims of domestic violence, the homeless, the poor, the young people in the criminal network, the drug addicts, the elderly, people in need left without care. The list can be very long.

the Social services can't solve the structural problems, which are now more and more often came to be referred to as the ”crisis of the social services”. It's all about the flaws in social policy that has made the people to fall through the meshes of the social security system.

The English department has a long and historic mandate to be the society's last-resort safety net. However, social services does not solve the structural problems, which are now more and more often came to be referred to as the ”crisis of the social services”. There is a significant number of cases because of deficiencies in social policies, which has made the people to fall through the net of social security, and the need to be caught up in society's safety net of last resort.

Although we expect some differences in the national surveys, and Sweden, taking into account a variety of situations, other than those of the other nordic countries. However, if we place any of the English terms in the other Nordic countries, Sweden has 143 homeless people, the 100,000 residents while in Norway, 67. No other nordic country is able to compete with the English figures.

this is A major task for the Swedish social workers of the day is to find homes and provide emergency aid for the people who don't have a roof over their heads.

we are not building at the rate of population growth. The other reasons are the settlement of the town bostadsförmedlingarna, the differences in the forms of conveyance of ownership, the dismantling of the public sector housing responsibilities, the increase in boendemässiga inequality and segregation. This has led to overcrowding and increased homelessness.

another example is that of försörjningsstödet, which is constantly met with disbelief and scepticism. It is also a denial of the facts is probably the greatest. As a prerequisite, in order to be able to integrate into the society, it is only possible to get one to work. The groups that have been integrated in the labour market, it is used in the social security system. They will now be in its own table. It is clear to us that we do not currently have a working arbetsmarknadsetablering. Not the least of which is the political game around the service's future to confirm this.

the national standard for social assistance in the year 2019, 3.090) for a single person. This plan should include, among other things, food, clothes, and shoes, leisure and play, health, consumer products, and newspaper and direct dial telephone.

which means that the group is receiving support are lagging behind and are caught in a poverty trap.

One of the political riots and looting claimed recently that the försörjningsstödet to be replaced by a check that is going to cash in for food, rent and clothing, so that it is not designed. The proposal has also gained the support of some veteran politicians in the moderpartiet.

What is the most regrettable characteristic of this type of maneuver by the political system, is that there is convincing scientific evidence from other countries that have tried these solutions, that they are going to stop arbetsmarknadsintegrationen and reinforce social exclusion.

this is One of the modern well, the most well-known and influential theorist, Richard Morris Titmuss (1907-1973). He is a thinker, who, at the date of the all of the to the highest degree are in high demand. Among other things, he asserted that modern societies have to be judged on the basis of how the welfare system treats its weakest members. One of the state's central duties is to make sure that no one is left out.

this theory has been subsequently developed into theories of social citizenship, which holds that all people have certain universal rights, which are addressed to all members of society, and to cover most of the legitimate needs of food, clothing, housing and an adequate standard of living. These rights have to be collectively financed, and are going to eat.

the year is now coming to an end, and when the English köpfesten is the greatest, there is the additional need to ask the question: WHERE is the DECENCY, the LOWEST THRESHOLD when it comes to the most vulnerable groups in society? The children at the homeless parents or children in families of income support, are entirely dependent of the good will of others to provide them with a decent standard of living. Social services do not conduct social policy, and the market does not have sufficient incentives to invest in poor communities. The responsibility rests heavily on the shoulders of the political system.

<