Sweden has a long tradition of clear and proactive decisions, and passing laws that are seen to the best interests of the child. We have antiagalagstiftningen, we have the particular legal professionals who will speak for the children's actions and the convention is now the law in sweden. However, something has gone wrong. As a little girl, to be protected from his or her parents, to a baby girl at birth exhibits withdrawal, yesterday, all, eventually, terribly wrong. The girl, referred to as the Little heart, to be protected and to be placed pursuant to the law on care of young persons (LVU), in a foster home. When the girl is aged just over two years, would the biological parents want her back. In the face of opposition from the social welfare will win her parents approval in the court of appeal. Ten months later, she was dead.
the administrative court, referring to precedent where it is clear that the court did not take into account the seriousness of the consequences to pull a child away from everything that is familiar. From security, to love and to care. What really matters is family. It is extremely strong, and that is prior to the rights of children. So, it looks like it in this country. It is weighing the parents ' words, heavier than the children. Here, the courts have adapted to the adults. Adults who are able to explain the how, where, when, what, and why something was done. Thus, extremely few children are capable of. In particular, not for small children. Therefore, the lead less than a tenth of the case against the child for criminal prosecution and even fewer to conviction.
the investigation now. No more need to be asked. This is because we have done all of that already. Five years ago, it was suggested a number of improvements in the Investigation, on the eve of the children and young people (SOU 2012:07), but there is no clear change in order to strengthen children's protection have been made. Maybe it is because of the lack of a clear political pressure. The children are not well-resourced team. The children will help not to win the election. Their parents, however, have both the resources and the voice of the. Now, finally, starting to politicians to act and to demand change. Both the opposition and the government, express, now, that urgent steps should be carried out. And that's a good thing. But where was the interest prior to the girl became a national concern, and sadness? Now it's too late in the day. It is far too late in the day. The little girl is no longer there. And we have not been able to protect her.
I've met these kids. Children who do not have the same rights as their parents. Parents who put the kids first, but not the alcohol, the drugs, or the vuxenrelationen to go ahead of the relationship with the children. I have been exploring the violence, abuse, and neglect. And frustrerats so many times over the lack of protection for children. The children will again and again have been let down by the public authorities charged with their protection. A child who, in the end, just have to wait for their 18th birthday that they finally will have the freedom to choose. Avoid having to meet with a violent parent, not having to clean up after the abuse, and not having to take a vuxenansvar, which had never been theirs to take.
If we are to dare to see the parents ' lack of care, or the use of force, we must also ensure that the law does in fact give room for the violence are punished, the
the parent's lack of care, or the use of force, we must also ensure that the law does in fact give room for the violence are punished. It will be clearly stated in the child custody proceedings in which it is not to be taken into account for the parent's use of violence, or the fact that more than a third of the father gets to keep custody of their children – despite the fact that the fathers are killing their children's mothers. This means that the fathers can stop their children and to arrange for a passport, to get the support of a psychologist and a change of school. This was clearly demonstrated in the case of a Small heart, which were not taken into account the damage it does to a small child being caught from the safety of his family. It is not a child's perspective. It's the one on the scope and nature.
in Order to ensure that the protection comes before the right of parents to their children is needed now is decisive action.
1. A review of the föräldrarätten is reflected in our laws and regulations, including, among other things, the LVU law (Law concerning the treatment of young people), and SoL (social service act) or in any part to the right of the child to be written first. There is a children's perspective, children's sense of security and the rights of children, which will go before the right of parents to their children.
in 2a to the mandatory training for the judiciary. In which each of the lawyers, police services and social services should receive training on the violence against the relatives of the child sexual abuse, and neglect, as well as the consequences of them.
3n, lex's Little heart. A clear reminder that we are, in each of the tvångsbeslut the children, to keep in perspective as the first. That made for an involuntary commitment of the child to take the child's perspective first. If there is a placing of the child, the child's right to security and continuity, as well as the implications of that to pull a child from a functional family should be weighed higher than that of the right of parents to their children.
4Socialtjänsten, after a few visits to the biological parents, or the unwillingness to provide, for example, urine, immediately report the matter to the court which will then have the opportunity to make an interim order that the child be returned to the home of the child's upbringing and to the security of the.
5. The representative shall represent the interests of the children shall be suitable and comply with both the knowledge and the fit and proper requirements. To date, the courts, following is a list. This means a lottery for the kids, then fitness is not to be taken into account.
the 6 Experts, such as psychologists, paediatric staff, or other experts shall be heard in the court, in cases where there is domestic violence, neglect or other deficiencies in the child's care, or in which twitter and facebook may put an end to, the aim is to highlight the consequences for the child.
7 Before the new law, according to the LATVIAN law on the care of a guardian). Treatment and support for the parents, shall be voluntary in respect of cases relating to child protection, health and well-being. With the LVW can be the social use of the law vis-à-vis the parents before making an LVU. It should not be up to the parents to decide to forgo the help and support of concern for the child is in distress.
It may sound harsh, but the current system means that the law and the application of it, in fact, it can mean that the public authority is in and of itself, is violence against children. It needs to be changed, so that no more children are likely to die or suffer due to the act or to the provisions of the law.
Link to a graphic