The DN of the Debate. System error when the regions themselves are investigating related injuries

the Representatives of the regions, which are responsible for the nation's hospital services, controlling at the same time, the company will determine whether the hospital's care had been properly, or if a patient is to receive compensation for iatrogenic harm. Regionföreträdarna is placed on the two chairs in deciding whether vårdskadade patients in the future.

the county councils ' mutual insurance company (Löf), the body that assesses the injuries caused by medical care, are not separate from the health care system. On the contrary, the governance of the representatives of the regions, which are, in essence, is the vårdinsatserna.

in order to have our son, Joel, would be to get the compensation they are entitled to the following as a consequence of measures taken, which made him partially paralyzed.

We were able to conclude that the sakkunnigutlåtandena, which supported his rejection of the contained material error.

Vårdskadan during an operation in 2017, and the work was at the cost of our son's life. For a very long time, was Joel's struggle against the severe pain and life-threatening infections.

those days are long gone now, but we have found a number of serious shortcomings in the protection of patients during the course of our struggle for the recognition that health care professionals had acted in the wrong. It took us a little over 2.5 years, with a three-rejection of compensation by the Lof before, and Joel was restored. In the process, he would never have been able to push myself. He's had enough to cope with everyday life. It is we, the parents, and our legal counsel, who put in countless hours to review the vårddokument, and put together the facts that point to the fallacy of the department's treatment of Joe. It's been like having a second job. Is this fair?

This is what happened in Joel's case.

in Spite of the obvious, the error handling, which we can read ourselves through the medical documents, it was decided Cited that Joel was paralyzed, was not a patient injury.

We were able to conclude that the sakkunnigutlåtandena, which supported his rejection of the contained material error.

One from the Cited independent and highly experienced specialists analyzed in the same documentation. He pointed to the serious deficiencies in the management of Joel's cases. In spite of the weaknesses of the Löfs their own evidence, and despite the additional expert's opinion, chose the Cited, to abide by his decision.

We have complained for a third time, but the Lof was solid. This time around, they referred to a statement by an expert, appointed by the Lof, but we were able to prove was disqualified.

We went to the Patientskadenämnden to the next panel. Both experts pointed to the same weaknesses that we ourselves have made. When the ruling Cited. Joel's injury was a compensable consequence of measures taken.

as A consequence of measures taken may affect the patient at any time. Therefore, the most prominent representative of the regions Anders Knape (M), president of the Swedish association of local authorities and regions INTERNATIONAL) to respond to the following:

1 , Lof, owned and financed by the regions. Of the board are, among other things, Rickard Simonsson, including the regional director in the Region of Örebro, sweden, and, therefore, is responsible health care provider for the care that Andy was in the hospital there. It is plausible that the health care provider that is negligent or otherwise at fault, and determines whether or not a fault has become committed, to have the same owner? What is the difference between regionsföreträdarna in their new roles, in – between, to give the treatment and evaluate patient injury claims, resulting in their own health care? The current structure is fair?

the 2 Cited is not independent of the regions, in the same way as, for example, Patientskadenämnden. the the chances are great that were Cited as taking irrelevant considerations into its owner's region's – best interests. What is the justification for the Anders Knape, the current set-up?