The DN of the Debate. SD, is leading the opposition in a bid to save the nuclear power plant

But one day before we rang in the new decade started with the early close down of the Swedish nuclear power plant Ringhals 2. If the decommissioning of the Swedish nuclear power is allowed to continue, it will go down in history as one of the greatest policy mistakes in the modern era. Stefan Löfven and the social democrats are officially abandoning american nuclear power is yet another proof of the priority of a thing over everything else – the government. We put it in Sweden first. Therefore, it is good to see that more have chosen to support our contribution to the saving of the nuclear power plant.

in Order to save nuclear reactors has been The sole party in parliament, proposed to give the state-owned Vattenfall, in directive to drive it, but also that the company shall not be obliged to have any restrictions when it comes to the planning, preparation or the building of new nuclear power plants. A proposal that the parliament decides, on the morning of Wednesday, or the week after.

This is to be welcomed, and the fact that the pro-nuclear opposition is united. If it lasts all the way into the case, we know only after holding the vote.

he had been long urged in order to maintain and develop Swedish nuclear power. Which is why we originally chose to cut us off from the now-torn energiöverenskommelsen. In a deal which from the start was doomed to failure. The complete closure of the door of the stable, leveranssäker, and the fossil-fuel-free generation of electricity, in the form of the use of nuclear power for the benefit of the väderbaserade sources of energy that are not able to guarantee electricity all the year round, was a reckless decision. History has already given us the right to, and the christian democrats left the energiöverenskommelsen in december in the hope of preserving it.

by Stefan Löfven and the social democrats are, once again, the Green party's puppets, when it comes to matters of political importance. This is despite the fact that two out of three swedes want to keep nuclear power, including that of the social Democrats ' own voters.

in Germany, a large nuclear power nation, with the ambition of the Swedish government for a rapid transition from a fossil-fuel-free nuclear energy to renewable sources of energy. The trend in this country, however, is not at all as expected, and it is something that we should all take a lesson from. Due to the rapid expansion of wind and solar power, in combination with an early phasing out nuclear power, are now in Germany to produce " dirty electricity from both coal and gas to make up for those days when the wind doesn't blow and the sun don't shine. The result? Increase in carbon dioxide emissions.

to shut down the nuclear power plant 1 and 2 before the end of their life cycle like the export of clean electricity in reducing. On the contrary, we are forced to import dirty power from our neighbouring countries, in particular to a greater extent. In a development that, according to the national institute of economic Research, may give rise to an increase in emissions of eight million tonnes per annum. An amount of 15% of the total emissions in the year 2018, for the entire united states.

due to the rapid expansion of wind and solar power, in combination with an early phasing out nuclear power, are now in Germany to produce " dirty electricity from both coal and gas to make up for those days when the wind doesn't blow and the sun don't shine.

It is obvious that the symbolfrågan to phase out of Swedish nuclear power is a more and more important to the government than to the actual effects of their decisions. Stefan Löfven and the social democrats are, once again, the Green party's puppets, when it comes to matters of political importance. This is despite the fact that two out of three swedes want to keep nuclear power, including that of the social Democrats ' own voters. Sweden is more than ever in need of real leadership. Leaders who have not lost the support of the people.

nuclear power is a cornerstone of the effort to reduce greenhouse gas (ghg) emissions is something that even the united nations intergovernmental panel on climate change signed up to. In Sweden the transport sector is electrified, and the emissions of greenhouse gases are kept to a minimum, is required both for existing nuclear reactors, as good as new.

today, it is almost a half of Sweden's electricity supply. In spite of this investment, the loss for the benefit of the subsidized wind turbines and solar panels. In order to be able to maintain and develop the nuclear energy is a need for further support to the kärnkraftsforskningen as well as a level playing field for competition between fossil-fuel-free kraftslagen.

in addition, it would pave the way for the possibility that in the future, the construction of new, modernized nuclear power stations and research infrastructures for the generation of nuclear energy. It's a policy that's good for Swedish households and industry, but, above all, climate change. First, however, we can save the nuclear power plant from the government.