The DN of the Debate. Praise to the välfärdssatsningen is not going to lower taxes

the Money to the welfare of humankind must also be for the welfare benefit. Resurstillskotten to be felt in the school, to be seen in the doctor's office and felt at home for the elderly. This is, by the savings that can be avoided, the operations to be retained, or to the bets. As the parties agree with the socialists on the need for more resources – even if some of the more questionable and late in the day than the others – it is a matter of course, to ensure that the billions being added to the local and regional governments, too, will the welfare benefit. Why would we, as socialists, to see that all the political parties to promise that the money that is now going to the welfare system will also stop the welfare system, and not to be used for tax cuts.

Actually, it is quite amazing that there are born more and more children in our country, at the same time, the number of elderly people is increasing at a rapid pace. A large group of people, it is the fact that health care can cure, and treat diseases that once meant certain death sentence it once was.

at the same time, there is also the new and greater demand for our well-being, a prosperity that is facing major challenges in the coming years. In many parts of the country, it's already tough out there, as in other parts of the hotel are the biggest challenges that still a few years away. In the coming years, we will need to set priorities to protect the well-being and, in addition to funding, we also need to find shared solutions and innovative approaches. We just have to help each other.

We would like to be informed of all the political parties in which they promise to resurstillskotten to local government and the regions not to be used for tax cuts.

Right now, the feel for, and with the conservatives, and the democrats want to make the occasional bet on the well-being, but there are many cities and regions, testifies to is the need for long-term resurstillskott not sifferbingo, which is based on a temporary and highly uncertain alliances. In the past moderatledda the government's time in power, 2006-2014 reduced taxes by 140 billion. Last year, the state budget, issued by the Swedish conservatives and christian democrats, and elected with the support of the sverigedemokrater, cut taxes by a further € 20 billion.

The social democrat-led government since the election victory in 2014, added a huge amount of resources to the social services sector, a sector that today has 100,000 more employees than under the previous centre-right government.

. Municipalities and regions have more than 90 billion dollars more to the year 2026, just to maintain today's standards of well-being, according to estimates from the ministry of finance. It will also be difficult to find the right staff to employ, in welfare, in some circles, it wouldn't even be enough to employ everyone who finishes high school, so a great need for staff, it will be in the next couple of years. This means that the welfare system, in addition to more resources, but also the need to find new ways of working, but also to be able to attract the people to himself. It is to be an employer of choice.

and, of course, also have to be a tough challenge. That is why it is a good thing that it's led by the government-appointed Välfärdskommissionen under the auspices of the minister of finance, Magdalena Andersson. The whole point of the mandate is necessary: to välfärdssektorns players, they will need to work together to enhance the quality of life and which has a mandate to the commission to look carefully at all of the possibilities to improve the prospects for a continuation of the strong, the welfare is also moving forward. This includes how we can ensure conditions of prosperity at the same time, which is seizing the digital opportunity.

We must all work together to enhance the prosperity of the time. At the same time, we need to learn from each other and help each other.

We, as socialists, is the guarantor of the welfare system be given priority in any future negotiating the budget. To take the fight to the wealth of resources, and the terms and conditions form an integral part of our policy thrust as a political party. For us, it is of course to provide substantial resources over a long period of time in the future, so that local and regional authorities have a reasonable planning conditions.

In the last term of office, saw the social democratic-led government to be the major contribution came with the municipalities and the regions of the part. During the course of this term, is our party to the guarantor, to it added at least 20 billion for the people's welfare. We're writing with that well-being has greater needs than that. Therefore, we will, at every opportunity, to push for a final cost will be much higher than that. In the budget that will be presented in the autumn of this year.

We want all political parties to stand up for the well-being of the practice, not just rhetoric. No party can legitimately claim to be of concern for the welfare of those at the same time, don't put the two straws in a cross, in order to ensure that their stay there.

" We want to see a skattesänkarstopp in the country, at least until the welfare system in Sweden is on the right track. We would therefore like to be informed of all the political parties in which they promise to resurstillskotten to local government and the regions not to be used for tax cuts.

If the parties are truly serious about that they would like to invest in the well-being, all of the municipalities and the regions, including those controlled by the conservatives, and the sverigedemokrater be able to put up with all of the resources available to be used as they are intended for.

the Money to the welfare system simply has to be the welfare to the part.
Link to a graphic