The DN of the Debate. Get to the audience that the media do not reflect reality

with the World media in general seem to be in a considerably stronger competition from new entrants, not just from Facebook, Google, and social media), and consider themselves too cool on the set of the powers that want to weaken them. The general debate is, in many ways, preoccupied with the talk of fake news, right-wing groups, the ”mainstream media”, and the trollfabriker. In the distance, the whole thing looks like a besinningslös fight their way out of the media's furious opponents, and the media itself.

In the shadow of these contentions, we would like to approach the criticism, and the role of the media in the samhällsmaskineriet in a different way. There is no reason to gloss over the journalists, or on their way to take care of a matter, but the blackening is just as useless. Instead, we believe in the education of the people; and it is hardly that the society consists of two main sets of media: one in which there is only the spread of the truth, and the other group is for all the lying. In fact, there is always a gap between media reality and real reality, it is the inevitable result of the medielogik that is not going to ”discuss away”.

the Citizens are able to take a well thought out position on social issues when they start to act like a good journalist should be doing: looking for a number of different sources and perspectives and then create their own image of the reality of the situation. After an attention-grabbing piece of news is told, for the first time, it is reasonable that the reader's hypothesis is this: It may not be entirely true, which means that it has to be a lie.

The crowd-pleasing sections of our society have been encouraged by the media philosophy of logic unfolding, and they are mutually reinforcing. The media loves to share their stories in the motsatsparet ”regular” people and the ”elites”.

It is the fact that the media industry has undergone profound changes over the past two or three decades, to all appearances, received numerous media representatives to link with a more severe criticism of them, for the phenomena did not exist in the past. If we travel in time to the 50's, 60's, 70's and 80's was in the written press I have king of the hill, the radio and the tv were on the left hand side of monopoly, and no global players were able to snack on annonskakan. The overwhelming majority of the population relied on what was said in the News, the Echo, or Report, and the daily papers were able to live well at a high circulation and a good hushållstäckning. A few of the social media, with angry call to arms, an ethically questionable uthängningar or ”näthat” did not exist. In general it was most of the time a little bit slower before the internet. It is perhaps not surprising that many of the editors-in-chief, and reporters and, sometimes, the dream from time to time.

this is Why it seems as more and more readers, listeners and viewers will now be as unhappy with it as the journalists are delivering to them? Yes, there is a simple answer, it can be divided into two: (a) the comparison of the large media presence, with other people's interpretations, and claims to have grown by leaps and bounds as a result of the internet and social media; and (b) it has become much easier to express and spread their discontent to the surrounding environment for the same reasons.

there really is not anything new, however, the consequences of which are likely to have been enhanced by digitization, increased the pace, social media's influence, and to increase the pressure on the staff.

the Media is portraying reality in such a way as to keep the interest up. They tell me, ”so, there is the issue of”, to quote the words of the Swedish newspaper Expressen, the current motto. There is a fragment of reality and make a news story out of it. This is a new, hitherto unknown, and attention-grabbing to be given priority over the analysis.

the Situation of the media can be equated to the pressure that is on a person to give a speech at a 50th anniversary gala. It is said to be interesting enough for the noise to be low, and special attention is paid to the one who believes they have a story to tell. And, when the transmitter has succeeded to the interest at any time held still for a few moments. This results in what we might call a ”medieverklighet”, which is not the same as the ”real reality”. And this is what every citizen should know and understand. Most likely, it is easier to ”medieträna the crowd” rather than trying to get the media to produce a different kind of content than they do today.

the Recipients need to be prepared for a society where the media logic, shapes our understanding of reality. It's the reasonably more accessible than trying to change the reporters, and the rubriksättare. The focus should be the people themselves are learning how to use a media flow that is becoming more and more the immense and messy. And, in order to make sense of the world we don't get to read the news, that is, God view of the Bible.

the Media is looking for sensational news, and a tough attitude to those in power in business and politics. In the middle of the logic elements into one of two groups: those that are revealed and those that are not yet revealed.

I would also like to put a finger on one another, in consequence of the press and other media of the development. The media is looking for sensational news, and a tough attitude to those in power in business and politics. In the middle of the logic elements into one of two groups: those that are revealed and those that are not yet revealed.

the Result is that the media is cultivating a skeptical attitude to all forms of established power structures. And now it has also come to affect them. We believe, therefore, that the rise of populist sections of our society have been encouraged by the media philosophy of logic unfolding, and that they are mutually reinforcing. The media loves to share their stories in the motsatsparet ”regular” people and the ”elites”. On the side of right, and the vänsterpopulism, we can also speak of the ”mediepopulism”.

Medielogiken to maintain its grip on those who want to tell you something, in the same way, in the day when the kommunikationsutgångspunkten was the tribe's best storytellers around a campfire in the evening. No matter how elaborate and imposing the values of today's cutting edge media company manages to articulate, they can't worm their way out of this situation, and it is high time that the general public would get rid of all the fantasies of how it could be any other way. It is medielogiken, stupid!