The DN of the Debate. Do not try to force the citizens to civilplikt in vain

According to the law on military service, Swedish citizens are called in to the education, training and employment for war-time needs. To be called out by the duty, is a significant intervention in a young person's life. Study plans, work plans, travel plans, etc., must be put to one side, and may need to be postponed for a full year, even though the service is far less than that. This impacts not only us, but also, inter alia, final salary, at the end of your working life, earned a pension, and more. There may also be socio-economic impacts.

that is Why it is essential that the supply of personnel to the civil defence forces are secured in a three-step process:

first, the ordinary people can be used.

to the extent that this is not enough to be voluntary of the space.

First, if this is not enough, it is called the staff in, with the duty of: .

We cannot stress enough the importance of the opportunities for recruitment in each of the steps in this staircase are being exhausted before the next is taken.

To take on the volunteers in the space, require a well-developed governance structure that is able to find the ones that are ready to be set-up as a volunteer, or we are missing a good opportunity to use volunteer support. By 2018, the year of the forest fire, there was, for example, several of the volunteers, who are not able to get caught up, due to lack of organization. As a result, the number of volunteers may appear to be less than it really is, as a result of that, the staff will be called in by the duty in vain.

first of all, have the experience, the less successful the training of the civilpliktiga beredskapsmän to be clarified. Similar positions have now been outlined in the debate, and it is difficult to see the relevance of such training programmes would be higher in the day than in the early 1990s.

our Experience shows that motivation is a key factor in the enrolment, if the duty is still in use. Self-Motivation is important, not only for the individual young people, but also for the education of the unmotivated civilpliktiga is not good management of public funds in the country.

the Education and training of the civilpliktsbefattningar, which in the past have historically been costly in the past, especially in the more skilled positions. In the case of the civilpliktiga there is no real increase in the risk of the investment in education and training do not give results. It may be more effective to invest the equivalent of the regular and volunteer activities, in order to weigh up the cost and the quality of service in relation to the ability of a society to achieve.

It is essential that the planning process is now being done in the right order, in the way that need to be noted prior to the training courses taken. Civilpliktsutbildningar will be introduced, but that they are faced with a real krigstidsbehov, which took place in the 1990s. Above all, have the experience, the less successful the training of the civilpliktiga beredskapsmän to be clarified. Similar positions have now been outlined in the debate, and it is difficult to see the relevance of such training programmes would be higher in the day than in the early 1990s.

the Existence of the national, has also been through the test of time raised the argument that there should be alternatives to military service, the right to be the alternative is not without consequences. This line of reasoning, which focuses on the introduction of the pliktbefattningar, which is led by human resources, is out of date.

instead, There is the question of the right to be a community. An argument leads to the totalförsvarspliktige to be assured of what we refer to as ”community status”. Accordingly, applications of vapenfrihet come up and been dealt with by The rekryteringsmyndighet, even during a period of time, then, in either military or civilplikt has been used. Not in any given year, the number of requests has been zero. Then, the numbering has been restarted, the number of applications is accordingly increased, as well as the avslagsfrekvensen. The service, which, in the case of national are, in practice, civilplikt.

the Location of the totalförsvarspliktiga, who was granted the right to be a community, therefore, is not a valid argument for the inclusion of the participants in the civilpliktssystemet.

the Right to be the alternative is not for each and every one. It is granted only to the person who applied for it, and Rekryteringsmyndighetens decision is likely to have a serious personal conviction against the use of weapons. It is, therefore, a process which must be assumed to eliminate or at least greatly reduce the risk to people other than those who have the required belief to be granted the right to be a community. The trade-off between the need to safeguard the supply of suitable employees, and the potential for applications for the right to be a community with a lot easier belief to have come back in pieces over the years, most notably in 1978 and 1991 to 1994. The potential for simulated applications of the law have not been considered and the right to be the alternative has gradually increased.

It should also be mentioned that not all totalförsvarspliktiga granted alternative status, from the 1990s onwards, has been employed by the civilplikt. In the year 2006 to be trained, for example, only four of the national, at the same time, which is 354 persons, of the same year, was granted the right to be a national. About 99 per cent of the national was, therefore, not out of any education at all. Far away from all of the civilpliktiga or have had in the community on the status. In the year 2006, approximately 120 employees civilplikt, and of these, four persons are granted the right to be a national.

as a result, national servicemen who are granted the right to be a national, not have been able to serve for a term of civilplikt because they have not met the requirements of the positions has been made.

It should also be pointed out that the posts in the svk, which was the last civilpliktsutbildningarna, they were placed in the class. This means that such a duty required the records check, according to the Swedish security protection act. This will require the consent of the control is designed, which means that the civilplikten, in practice, on a voluntary basis.

however, Despite the potential incentive to apply for a vapenfrihet in order to avoid the service cost were no major changes in the number of vapenfriansökningar over the last few years, and the long-term trend was downward. The location of the totalförsvarspliktiga, who was granted the right to be a community, therefore, is not a valid argument for the inclusion of the participants in the civilpliktssystemet.