Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

No, no, we didn't give in to peer pressure'

Lars Melins op-ed was, in the simplest terms, is a question of a certain amount of language engineering. With the support of their own and others ' research, c

- 8 reads.

No, no, we didn't give in to peer pressure'

Lars Melins op-ed was, in the simplest terms, is a question of a certain amount of language engineering. With the support of their own and others ' research, claimed White, among other things, that it doesn't help that the launch of the more beautiful words for a sad phenomena – reality, or our perception of it, changes were not significantly affected.

And this is certainly the case, even though the White may not be sufficiently took into account the fact that this is deserving to replace the highly pejorative, or offensive expressions (moron, dumb, more, is mentioned in the article to a more neutral or positive ones.

(SAOL, 14th edition, 2015 , available through the Swedish language.to see). SAOL-redaktionen would be uncritical to have a few words with ”the disappearance of the low-frequency” at the insistence of lobbningsgrupper.

But this was not the case. The word funkofob is not in the dictionary, and the word funkofobi, which is the one referred to, we had to put out all on your own, even if it's in the post lobbades on the floor. And that a cis-person is taken also to completely our own decision. Sure, there are cases where the word is put out at the suggestion of interested in SAOL drive, but only after an editorial assessment that the word is defending his seat in the back.

in the Words of funkofobi and a cis person, is not the disappearance of a rare. The word cis-person to illustrate in addition that the antonym (an antonym), to the transgender person as a major urvalsprincip both of the words in pairs that should be in it.

<
Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.