Dagens nyheter's Debate Them. The drawing of lots, parents feel powerless

as more and more opt out of the public schools in favor of private schools. Despite the fact that it will lärarfackens the president by Johanna Jaara Åstrand, and Åsa Fahlén with a proposal on how the survey has been queued to be able to offer more places or to the poor functioning of schools are going to be better. I would like to offer the parents a reason the drawing of lots, or bring boendesegregationen the full effect.

We welcome the fact lärarförbundens of interest, in order to increase the knowledge of the skolvalet, and an active school choice. To be a well-informed, have a better understanding of skolvalet is hardly friskolornas wrong. We have been in active school choice for years to come. In which, we hope, just like the lärarfacken for a change.

this does not, however, as to the policy, cheered on by the lärarfacken should restrict the ability to be able to plan for their children's education. Lärarfacken suggests that the waiting time is prohibited as a choice, and everyone must choose a school at the same time close to the start of school. The reason is that to get the number of students with a lower educational background end up in schools that have students with a high level of training to choose. Not that there is no convincing evidence that there is a school of thought that fits these individuals, but because it is, on paper, reduce segregation, or possibly, in the preferred solution of the lärarfackens members. A top-down approach that lacks the elevperspektiv.

the Queue occurs because some schools are very popular. One solution would, of course, to be in place to increase the number of school places in these schools. However, these proposals are conspicuous by their absence from both the government and the trade unions.

it may be that it is called the common antagningsperiod, but in practice, it is a re-write of the lot. There are a limited number of places, and there are probably more, not less, are going to want to opt for the popular local schools. And, because of the principle of subsidiarity means that the boendesegregationen get the full effect, as will the pairings be a way for you to determine the selection of the. That is something we are confident will receive most of the parents, to feel more, not less, to life.

Only 15 per cent of the country's students in a private school, even though it appears to be the reason for the school's problems. The students of a school in Hagfors, have parents with lower levels of education than in schools in sweden will give the great impression of the statistics, but they are not the school's major problems. The major problems associated with segregation, is a relatively small number of schools in disadvantaged areas that lack long-term leadership and organization, and, despite the unsatisfactory performance continues. However, instead of taking the debate to where it belongs, it suggests the changes for the whole of the education system and to find the problems of the private schools that are working.

the Queue occurs because some schools are very popular. One solution would, of course, to be in place to increase the number of school places in these schools. However, these proposals are conspicuous by their absence from both the government and the trade unions. What can you say about a national target that, rather than building off of the popular friskolornas queues in the next few years?

There is also no insight as to why private schools are becoming popular as well. There can be a clearer focus on the study environment, and high expectations for all children. If nothing else, the ever-increasing proportion of the friskolelever to force the public schools to that realization.

the Schools are under the same circumstances getting different results. The teachers, with the same conditions, very different results. It is, we will never lärarfacken to discuss. The educational outcomes will be determined, in the classroom, not in the antagningsstatistiken.
Link to a graphic