Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook
Featured corrupción Crímenes Turquía Petróleo Feijóo

The Constitutional Court admits Vox's appeal against the repeal of sedition and the embezzlement reform

And he again rejects the battery of challenges against several magistrates, including former minister Campo.

- 14 reads.

The Constitutional Court admits Vox's appeal against the repeal of sedition and the embezzlement reform

And he again rejects the battery of challenges against several magistrates, including former minister Campo

MADRID, 7 Mar. (EUROPA PRESS) -

The Constitutional Court (TC) has agreed in its plenary session this Tuesday to admit for processing the appeal filed by Vox against the penal reform that repealed sedition and modified embezzlement, while rejecting the challenges launched in various matters against its president, Cándido Conde-Pumpido, and other magistrates, including former Justice Minister Juan Carlos Campo.

As reported by the court of guarantees, the magistrates will study Vox's challenges against the penal reform contained in Organic Law 14/2022, of December 22, on the transposition of European directives and other provisions for the adaptation of criminal legislation to the legal system of the European Union, and reform of crimes against moral integrity, public disorder and dual-use weapons smuggling.

In addition, in this internal conclave, the TC has studied the challenges presented by Vox in different appeals against Conde-Pumpido, Campo and the magistrates María Luisa Segoviano and Laura Díez to reject eleven "outright", including those referred to as ' the law of only yes is yes', that of democratic memory and decree-law 32/2021 on urgent measures for labor reform.

The Plenary has argued that these challenges affect the 'quorum' of the TC -which requires a minimum of 8 of the 11 magistrates that currently make it up-, so they would mean "an unacceptable stoppage of the functions of the court".

"The safeguarding of the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction demands, and at the same time justifies, that, in order to issue this resolution, none of its magistrates present should not be excluded from the formation of the Plenary," he said.

Likewise, the Plenary has declared the loss of object of the challenges promoted in relation to two appeals: one against Law 8/2021 by which civil and procedural legislation is reformed to support people with disabilities in the exercise of their capacity law, and another against decree-law 21/2021 by which social protection measures are extended to deal with situations of social and economic vulnerability.

The guarantee court has explained that these challenges are pointless because both procedures have been resolved. The first, in a dismissal sense due to a judgment of last September 13, and the second because it was inadmissible for processing on April 28.

He has also pointed to a "supervening loss of the object" of several challenges against Campo because the TC already agreed at the end of February to support the decision of this magistrate to voluntarily withdraw from the deliberation of various issues.

The challenges in the appeals against the 'Celáa law' are framed in this third group; the reform of the Workers' Statute to guarantee the labor rights of people dedicated to delivery in the field of digital platforms; decree-law 14/2021 on urgent measures to reduce temporary employment in public employment; the comprehensive protection law for children and adolescents; and against the minimum vital income.