Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook
Featured RWallstreetbets Trump Binance ProtonMail PlanB

Young Left undermines the ethical debate

The best musical filmtipsene It is skivebom when Young Left get KrFs involvement in the field of biotechnology-the case to be about who the parents are. It als

- 6 reads.

Young Left undermines the ethical debate
The best musical filmtipsene

It is skivebom when Young Left get KrFs involvement in the field of biotechnology-the case to be about who the parents are. It also shows a lack of understanding of the ethical challenges of egg donation and assisted reproduction for single people.

- Undermines the single parent Debate

single mothers and fathers do a formidable effort for their children, and I doubts not for a second their ability to be parents and to exercise care. On the contrary, has familiepartiet the christian democratic party has long had single parents high on the agenda, and working to make their life easier, both financially and practically. But it's also not what this debate is all about.

Question Amelia Aune smooth jump above in their post, is whether the state should add up to the fact that children are born with a parent, and about children's right to know their origin to give way to the adult's desire for children. It is undeniably so that it is more vulnerable for a child to have one parent than two. This was compelling for several members of the bioteknologirådet, that was divided in its recommendation.

Moved to tears

When Aune writes about the kristenkonservative idealfamilien, there is a stråmann as forkludrer the whole debate. For bioteknologidebatten is not about the parents, about the orientation or number, but if the state is to facilitate that children are born with a parent and the vulnerability it entails. The most important thing is not that there is one mother and one father. Likekjønna parents can be just as good as heterosexual, so this is also a derailing of the biotechnology debate.

andropause can be a great sadness, and the dream of children strong. But in the debate on egg donation and assisted reproduction of single, weighs the concern for children's right to know its biological origin, heavy for the Sector. Again I will point out that this is not about the adults ' needs, suitability or rights. For us to have the rights of the child the right of way in front of the adult's desire for children.

Turn On the LydErrorAllerede plus customer? Log into herError DIVERGENT OPINIONS: On the Right items in the weekend stands among other surrogacy and egg donation on the agenda. There are divisions within the party in respect of the opinions around the issues. What is it that makes these issues so contentious? The answers you get here. Video: NTB Scanpix / Shutterstock / NTB / Bioteknologirådet Show more

The difficult debate about the identity, belonging and the state's role and responsibilities were greatly reduced because of the hastebehandlingen Ap, SV and Frp let up. Maybe we could got to a more reflected debate without labels of the cultivar mørkemann, kvinnehater and kristenkonservativ familiemoralist, if we had the time to actually discuss the various proposals.

It has gone fast in the turns with This at times also, but when we come to discuss the new complex proposal with several ethical issues, I hope we can take the time to listen and argue.

I wish the Young Left would be to raise the debate and discuss the ethical challenges of egg donation and assisted reproduction for single people.

Young the Left is in addition for commercial surrogacy, so we are clearly far from each other in the questions that deal with biotechnology. It is completely fair. It is not just okay to historical subject a meningsmotstander, then jump bucks over the actual issues.

Will use the overskuddsegg: - does not Exist

Want to discuss?

Visit Dagbladet debate!
Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.