Late on Wednesday evening adopted, Parliament is the Labour party's proposal for changes in the naturmangfoldsloven, with support from the centre party and the coalition parties Right, Left and Christian democratic Party. The law regulates, among other things lisensjakt of the wolf and other rovvilt, and now should section 18 be changed so that it should "be emphasized about bestandsmål that is passed in Parliament, is reached".Government our renewal Leader
The round, the formulation obscures the seriousness. Bestandsmålet is a minimum number of animals determined by Parliament to ensure the species ' survival. It is used to ensure a proper management and that Norway will fulfill our responsibility for Bernkonvensjonen, which commits Norway to take care of endangered plants and animal species. With this background, we have a minimumstall for it is seen as a viable population.
Now done minstestandarden to the ceiling on the number of animals. The change means that when bestandsmålet for rovvilt is reached, this becomes an independent criterion for that license to the felling is given. Law states from before fixed it to be compelling social reasons to trap endangered animals. Now made it easier. In the proposal from the Labour party said it straight out: "the Criteria for felling, shall be deemed to be fulfilled when bestandsmålet is reached and the harvesting does not threaten the population's survival".Trump is an authoritarian Leader
the Wolf is a protected and a critically threatened species in Norway. Both Bernkonvensjonen and the nature diversity act is there to ensure the viability of just such species. The debate has largely been about whether the legislative amendment itself is a violation of our international obligations. The climate and miljøminister Sveinung Rotevatn (V) at the written questions from Une Bastholm (MDG) black Parliament that the circular formulation of the legislative amendment does not necessarily want to be the violation of the Bernkonvensjonen, but that he believes a government as outlined in the proposal will be it. The ministry of justice has previously stated that the Bernkonvensjonen does not allow a control for a bestandsmål regardless of the convention's terms and conditions for felling.
the Convention shall protect the the endangered species, not minimize them. Regardless of whether the legislative amendment itself is a violation of Bernkonvensjonen, is it clearly a violation of the intention.
no Matter how practice, the decision is clear: It is easier to be allowed to shoot wolves in Norway in the future. This we feel is a step in the wrong direction. The animal is listed because it is acutely threatened with extinction. Now threatened the wolf even more than before.This is dangerous Comment
Want to discuss?Visit Dagbladet debate!