socialist left Karin Andersen wrote a post where she as usual disparages his political competitors with accusations of a lack of understanding of solidarity. SV seems obviously it is more important to discuss the number of refugees to Norway than to provide help as many as possible of those who need help the most.Ove Trellevik. Photo: NTB Scanpix Show more
Right in time with to create new stortingsprogram. We have supposed that the number of refugees we accept to be based on the extent to which integration is successful. In my opinion, we have not succeeded well enough with the integration.
at the same time, we see a world with increasing migration and a growing need for assistance. The question should be how can we help as many people as possible. There are approximately 70 million refugees. We will help best to take a few thousand to us or we help out the best way to help significantly more in the vicinity? This is the basic question.
Here at home works the economic integration of refugees for the poor. We use large resources on integration and refugees subsistence. From Brochmann II-selection and the SSB, we can derive that every refugee has a livsløpskostnad of 15-20 million per person. By accepting the 3000 refugees a year, this gives an annual cost of approx. 50 billion.
This means that economic integration is very challenging and demanding. Other STATISTICS report that addresses child poverty in the Uk, supports this view.
the Figures show that we need to get better at the integration policy. Immigrants are unfortunately overrepresented in the voldstatistikkene in Oslo, and extreme islamism is regarded by the PST as the greatest terrorist threat on a par with far-right extremism in Norway.I am ashamed of my country Debate
far Too few refugees have the wherewithal to be able to easily be integrated in a høykostland as Norway. Therefore, the integration time and requires a lot of resources. Therefore, should Parliament adopt the government's proposal to integreringslov.
The new law to contribute to a more targeted qualification in the workplace. Until we succeed better with the integration, I believe that we should not accept more kvoteflyktninger.
Norway is the country in Europe that has received the most kvoteflyktninger. If we are in a period of time, stops the reception of refugees, and the tightening asylretten so asylretten provides opportunities for us, we will in larger extent be able to free up resources to help in the migrants ' vicinities.
the united nations development programme (UNDP) published recently report that many båtmigranter from Africa put on the flight without having the real need of protection. The extent of this must be reduced.
When the SV will only discuss if it is 100, 1000 or 5000 kvoteflyktninger that is the right level, is it really a clean følelsesstyrt debate whether to buy themselves a good conscience.
the Right wants a debate about how resources can best be used, so that we can help the most vulnerable people – wherever they may be located. This is also supported by researchers, and to show international solidarity in practice.Sara can get stay in the Uk after 18 years You can submit your article and opinion piece in Dagbladet here
Want to discuss?Visit Dagbladet debate!