the Ministry will put in the time effort to make the scheme with arbeidsavklaringspenger (AAP) municipal.
I would discourage in the strongest, and my warning should be viewed in light of the upcoming eldrebølgen and the ongoing prevent their destruction of the welfare system our through the mitigation of the scheme with arbeidsavklaringspenger.
In the documents from my , the municipality says that my demented father got less help from the government because I was a neighbor and was considered very "available". I felt that the burden was laid on me as the next of kin, and that I was pushed into a omsorgsrolle.
My father went to take the bus to work in the middle of the night, in the only too, and a shirt. I lived in constant anxiety to find him dead there. I was akuttpersonale 24 hours a day. It was in and out of the hospital, heart attack and judgment. The hospital signaled the clear need for institusjonsplass.
I begged for more help, but no. A doctor's certificate was not to avoid. After a long period of absence due to illness was I "agree" with my employer to terminate employment.
upon termination, refused NAV me benefits for a long period of time. Thus disappeared savings. When the father died, concluded, suggested that he had not received proper help.
Thus, I sit again with guilt. In retrospect, I have received several psychiatric diagnoses that has led me to be qualified right. In the years I was living with chronic søvnunderskudd combined with the constant fear of a crushing the standby mode.
No one comes from such a thing with your health intact.The new kvinnefella
I have possibly a few hours late on the day where I work. The nights consists of nightmares. Even after many years of treatment do not understand my brain that beredskapssituasjonen no longer is real. The result is in addition, chronic fatigue.
Then came the changes about karenstid in the AAP scheme. Now also I go a whole year without income. The politicians have decided that the NAV-clients are faster fresh if the one stipulated to lose velferdsytelsene their.
I can guarantee that there is a giant fallacy.
Since I own their own home, " says NAV that it must be sold and the profits used up before sosialstønad can be given. There is no legacy to take off. The bank said no to refinance because I am on arbeidsavklaringspenger. I had a disability insurance, they had said yes because this is considered to be more stable income.
initially I was a fully-working person who contributed to the community, but I are deprived of a permanent job, health, and house and home. Eight years of my life are gone, and I'm not even allowed to be sosialklient.When the policy came home to my mom (89)
In addition, I have over several years through one of the WELFARE measure after the other until I get to apply for the disabled.
The real purpose is to enforce the almighty arbeidslinja; to prove that the situation has not made me sick enough to be taken care of by the welfare system further.
"All the treatment is not attempted" seems to be the mantra when the NAV declines uføresøknader. Alternative treatment suggests the also. I have tried most of it already, but I draw the border on quackery.
Well-prepared with sedative medications, I frequently meet up at the Register tiltaksleverandør and talk chirping positively on the HR-languages that I will soon be out of a job, that I should be "framoverlent", having the "purpose" and be "hungry".
I must talk about that it does not play any role that I only have 1. the year of the lycée from the 80's and a over the eight-year long stay in arbeidshistorikken my, I can't explain in a way that employers will accept.
Long-term illness is not a innsalgsargument. It is the opposite. However, employers are reportedly in the queue to get me. It is also arbeidslinja to the NAV that says that my supervisor should tell me. This is like insisting that the earth is flat. And I am "a sweet lady" even though I have flipped 50. Ikkeno’ problem to get a job then. So nice! Sex my is obviously a good argument in the NAV-guides also. That is a man and pusher 50.
I will be unwell to think about what this company earns on my disease. On the positive side, I should hardly fear for personlighetstestene on jobbintervjuene a place where promote. Those who are callous and low empathy scores tend to be very well on these tests. When they do a coup if they get their hands on me. Here are the full pot. It has my lack of trust to everyone and everything provided for, in combination with the selection of pharmaceutical rekreasjonsmidler I have to take daily for it all to stand upright.
Today's employers must obviously want employees who are so bedøvd that they hardly know where they are located.
So when is the municipalities in the future get take advantage of you then you get sick, and then to the same municipality to deny access to the benefits that "confirms" that the municipality itself has done anything wrong?
It is namely AAP-during which determines the basis for any uføresøknad. And how will municipalities ensure the obvious psykiatripasienter in the AAP scheme? NAV can manage it not through tiltaksleverandørene. Among the countless I have been in contact with, I have not seen a shred of health-related expertise. Where is the HR and "purpose" and "framoverlent" for all the money.
He as the pusher 50 is well underway to push me nuts. With the diagnoses for my this is a huge achievement. I will also warn against to complain to the municipality on the health services, if the municipality later shall have the responsibility to provide you with financial benefits.
Complaints , you run the risk of probably unfavourable treatment or to be put to sort the shrimp on a sykehjemskjøkken, pedaling garbage in a container or brew your tea for the same byråkratene that has put you in the mess you've ended up in.Nav says Elin Marie (40) has done everything right - rejections Dagbladet Plus
I will also challenge the labor minister Torbjørn Røe Isaksen and the NAV: When the public even the closest systematic underdimensjonerer care services while they insist that the old should stay at home – is it then proper that the relatives who get sick of the strain would later be forced to fight for years in the NAV system, if the medical criteria for benefits are met?
Sounds "karenstid" with one year without income fair and reasonable and in these cases – where the situation is the public's own sake? Why does you not instead be repaid from the municipalities for the expenses of these kin-cases provides the state and the NAV?
I'm not alone. We are many. It is the women, this is primarily going over the. Diskrimineringslovverket was designed to provide equal opportunities for civic participation. I'm sitting with a feeling of having been inside, to make an atonement for 8 years, because the freedom of movement of and the scope of my have been greatly reduced so long.
If a short time is my income to zero. Because the municipal employees believed they had the right to break the law. It is just to congratulate those of Norwegian women with older family members as next of kin.
In the worst case you are subjected for a controlled winding-up, directed by the municipalities and the welfare state. You must be dependents of the men their when the NAV slams the karens-the door in your face you. Welcome back to the kitchen.- A scandal
Want to discuss?Visit Dagbladet debate!