Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

Bitcoin vs. the crypto-World: A question of centralisation – the location on Wednesday

the Bitcoin seems While to stabilize price, it is also in many of the Altcoins are relatively good. So Stellar Lumens (XLM) recorded within the last seven days

- 28 reads.

Bitcoin vs. the crypto-World: A question of centralisation – the location on Wednesday
the Bitcoin seems While to stabilize price, it is also in many of the Altcoins are relatively good. So Stellar Lumens (XLM) recorded within the last seven days of strong rises. But how it looks with the original idea of decentralisation? You can be facing about the Ecosystem, to wander, you have to pinch sometimes, the eyes together, to the centralization of some of the projects see.

By Phillip Horch
22. May 2019BTC$7.866,00 -0.87%part Facebook Twitter LinkedIn xing mail

The price of Bitcoin has, so it seems to have currently, recovering from the slight decline from the end of last week. This is known to be fast: While some (Mainstream)brand of media reports about the short-term reached to 7,000 U.S. dollars, is the price of Bitcoin a long time ago about it again. As before, the question of whether technical indicators, such as the most recent Golden Cross play a role for the further development here. However, with all of the analysis, you should remind yourself every now and again to the basic ideas of crypto-currency, away from the Bitcoin price: the decentralisation.

The mother of all crypto-currencies represent this Ideal like no other. Finally, it is for BTC to be one of the few projects that work without any Institution. Imitators we know that there are thousands. One observation forces itself into consciousness. Behind a lion's share of the Blockchain projects initiators, CEOs, partnerships and/or collaborations, the show completely towards the center, instead of focusing on decentralisation are.

Away from the Bitcoin price: From decentralisation there is no trace

examples, there are currently many. To call directly one that stirs the crypto Community currently: Bitconnect allegedly wants to go in the second round. The alleged Scam project facilitated gullible donors, according to information from the authorities about a billion dollars. The FBI was looking for Victims, which should help the Federal Agents in the investigation. Behind some of the masterminds of the time, riding the hype wave. Board driver, which benefited indirectly from the Bitcoin rate occurs, by promised large profits, to make later with the money from the dust. Of decentralisation, there is no trace.

Three things

you can Go through the list of crypto-currencies, it is not necessary to search long to find more tend to be centralist projects. So about Ripple wants to climb using the XRP-Token to the crypto-throne. It is: A Central character named Brad Garlinghouse, who is not tired to emphasize the advantages of XRP and Ripple. These may have their justification; the Use Case of xRapid and the Ripple Ecosystem is not to be denied. However, you can repeat confidently: of decentralisation, there is no trace.

Bitfinex, one of the current concerns of the crypto-scene starts, despite (or because of?) of all the quarrels and disagreements of a Initial Exchange Offering (IEO). This – at least that is the common Suggestion is to bring a new Generation of tokens, the want to be especially safe.

As these are already listed, prior to their Launch on the Bitcoin exchanges, as an Argument, you have passed certain safety tests and can, therefore, acted without hesitation, are bought and sold. What hides this reasoning, however, often The exchanges themselves are not sure. If Cryptopia, QuadrigaCX, or the largest crypto-trading space Binance – none of these exchanges could be protected in the past from attacks. To put it in the crypto-Slang: Funds were never #SAFU. And this is mainly due to what it wants to handle Bitcoin: a Single Point of Failure, i.e., a Central point of attack, the attacker can exploit.

decentralisation: A non-reflective, Ideal?

Sure, and a must for all the criticism, grant, the topic of decentralization, an Ideal that is written in the cryptographic Community, among others, without reflection on all the flags. For some projects, an Institution may be useful. Imagine IOTA without a coordinator. The Tangle would have been without a centralized start point of hardly functional. Also, it needs a company or initiators such as, for example, the Team of Lite.IN the driving block of grove, Bitcoin-and Altcoin - adaptation forward. With your Bot for the Messenger service WhatsApp, they created such an approach is quite capable, centralised and detours, a decentralised money system, or even the biggest macro-economic in the history of mankind to bring to the people.

Nevertheless, In an increasingly globalized world, decentralisation – especially in the financial system – an Alternative that not only protects against Inflation. Also, the value of the memory function, the independence of Central banks, as well as possible financial Integration Ideal, which can be then high. These are then – one might forgive the utopian vision of the future – regardless of the Bitcoin price. Because this would be in its enforcement in the case of a BTC per BTC.

You're a Blockchain or crypto-Investor? The digital crypto-compass is the first market letter for digital currencies, and provides you with monthly exclusive assessments and comprehensive analysis of the current situation on the Blockchain- & crypto-markets. the for free Now

test crashes More:

Why XRP Bitcoin from the throne and Ripple still, stock transaction volume can have: Bitcoin takes Visa, MasterCard and PayPal on the "Ripple to the moon!" The company employs a private XRP-Bot army?
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.